Black/Dotted
Red/Dashed & Dotted
Blue/Long Dashed
Magenta/Solid
question id: fish-go-scarf-1
Exercise 1 Here is a graph of four different functions.
Regard those four functions as
For each of the following plots, the single function graphed has an anti-derivative which is one of
A. Which of the four functions shown in the top graph is an anti-derivative of the function graphed just below?
Black/Dotted
Red/Dashed & Dotted
Blue/Long Dashed
Magenta/Solid
question id: fish-go-scarf-1
B. Which of the four functions shown in the top graph is an anti-derivative of the function graphed just below?
Black/Dotted
Red/Dashed & Dotted
Blue/Long Dashed
Magenta/Solid
question id: fish-go-scarf-2
Exercise 2 The graph shows a continuous function
Draw a continuous version of
Exercise 3 Early in Math 141Z we undertook to figure out how fast a satellite travels. As you recall, we measured the orbit height r from the center of the Earth. Assuming a circular orbit (which is not necessarily a good assumption) the total path length of an orbit is
Then we asked, how large is the centripetal acceleration needed to keep a satellite in orbit of radius
It is crazy to take the square root of a length. There is no such thing as
question id: differential-orbit-1
Units aside, consider the formula
The figure shows a diagram of the situation. There is a satellite in circular orbit. (Earth hasn’t been included in the diagram.) Annotating one point of the orbit is a vector,
The change in the velocity vector over half the orbital time is simple:
Now calculus comes in: the change in velocity is the integral with respect to time of acceleration over the time to complete half an orbit.
We can simplify by setting the “start” time to zero. The end time is how long it takes to complete half an orbit. This will be the distance covered divided by the speed. The half circumference of the orbit is
Now we will take a false step. (You may not see it as such yet, but heads up!) The acceleration is constant: the satellite is always a constant distance from the center of the Earth. That is the nature of circular orbits. So the integral is simple:
Where is the flaw in reasoning? First, although the magnitude of the acceleration is constant, the acceleration is a vector which is certainly not constant as the satellite moves through the orbit. And, being a vector, we need to keep track of the changing components of the vector. Referring to the diagram, only the “horizontal” component of the acceleration contributes to the change in velocity from point 1 to point 3, because that change is entirely horizontal.
Look at an intermediate point between 1 and 3. The vector
We’ve written the differential of the relationship because we will substitute for
0
2
question id: differential-orbit-2
question id: differential-orbit-3